论文部分内容阅读
目的 评价疾病预防控制机构工作人员SARS防治知识刊授效果。方法 选取地级市、县级市 (县 )、镇三级的疾控人员 ,利用统一测试问卷 ,采用匿名封闭式自填问卷调查的方式对其进行SARS防治知识及相关态度调查 ,并利用《华南预防医学》杂志进行SARS防治知识培训 (刊授 )及其效果观察。结果 培训前后分别调查 374、378名疾控人员 ,培训前后疾控人员的SARS防治知识平均分分别为 4 1 8、6 0 7分 (t =12 6 1,P <0 0 1) ,总合格率从培训前的 5 1%上升至培训后的 5 2 6 %(χ2 =2 0 6 6 ,P <0 0 1) ;培训后地级市、县级、镇级的人员合格率及平均分比培训前均有不同程度上升(均P <0 0 1)。培训前 86 6 %的人员认为基本掌握SARS疫情的预警、上报和处理方法 ,5 0 0 %人员不担心在处理SARS疫情时被感染 ;培训后两项正确回答率分别为 94 5 %、6 0 5 % ,均高于培训前 (均P <0 0 1)。培训前不同年龄、文化程度、职称、所学专业、从事专业的人员平均分比较差异无显著性 ,而培训后学历高、所学公共卫生专业、从事流行病学业务的人员的平均分均高于其他人群 (均P <0 0 1)。 6 1 4 % (199/32 4 )人员认为该次刊授效果好。结论 利用医学杂志对疾控人员进行SARS防治知识培训的方法 (刊授 )是可行和有效的。
Objective To evaluate the effect of knowledge of SARS prevention and control among staff of disease prevention and control institutions. Methods CDC members at prefecture-level cities, county-level cities (counties) and townships were selected to carry out SARS prevention and control knowledge and related attitudes survey using the unified test questionnaire and anonymous closed self- South China Journal of Preventive Medicine "to carry out SARS prevention knowledge training (published) and its effect observation. Results Before and after training, 374,378 CDC members were investigated before and after training. The average knowledge of SARS prevention and treatment before and after training was 418,600 (t = 1261, P <0.01) respectively. The rate increased from 51.1% before training to 52.6% after training (χ2 = 2066, P <0.01). After the training, the passing rates and average scores of people in prefecture-level cities, county-level cities and townships Than before training were all increased to some extent (P <0.01). Before training, 6% of the respondents considered that the basic method of early warning, reporting and treatment of the SARS epidemic was in place and that 500% of the staff were not worried about being infected when dealing with the SARS epidemic. The correct answer rates after the training were 94.5% and 60% respectively 5%, all higher than before training (all P <0.01). Before training, the average scores of staff of different ages, education levels, professional titles, majors and professionals did not differ significantly, but the post-training qualifications were high, the average scores of those who studied public health specialty and engage in epidemiological business were all high In other populations (all P <0.01). 6 1 4% (199/32 4) Personnel considered this publication as effective. Conclusion It is feasible and effective to use the medical journal to train the disease control personnel on SARS prevention and treatment knowledge.