目的 :探讨新式剖宫产的手术方式及其临床价值。方法 :对 46 8例有手术指征的孕妇随机分为三组 ,即新式剖宫产不缝合腹膜组、缝合腹膜组及子宫下段剖宫产组。对手术时间、术中出血量、术后病率及盆腔B超检查情况进行对比观察。结果 :二种新式剖宫产术式与子宫下段剖宫产术比较 ,手术时间、术中出血量、术后病率差异有显著性 (P <0 .0 5 ) ,新式剖宫产二种术式比较 ,术中出血量、术后病率差异无显著性 (P >0 .0 5 ) ,手术总时间及盆腔B超检查结果差异有显著性 (P <0 .0 5 )。结论 :新式剖宫产术手术时间短、出血少、病人疼痛轻、排气快、术后病率低 Objective: To explore the surgical method of new cesarean section and its clinical value. Methods: A total of 468 pregnant women with surgical indications were randomly divided into three groups: the new cesarean section, the peritoneal suture group and the lower uterine segment cesarean section. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative morbidity and pelvic B-ultrasound were compared. Results: Compared with cesarean section in the lower uterine segment, the two new cesarean sections showed significant differences in operative time, intraoperative blood loss and postoperative morbidity (P <0.05), and two new cesarean sections There was no significant difference between the two groups (P> 0.05), the total operation time and pelvic ultrasound examination (P <0.05). Conclusion: The new cesarean section operation time is short, less bleeding, the patient’s pain, fast exhaust, low postoperative morbidity