论文部分内容阅读
去年3月15日,新修改的《消费者权益保护法》正式实施,但是大多数人却忽视了同日起实施的最高法院《关于审理食品药品纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的规定》(以下简称《食品药品司法解释》),下面几个典型案例可以为消费者有效维权支招。[案例一]黄金手链仅戴几天就断裂,谁负责任?张先生花费26900元购买了一根男士黄金手链,刚戴四天,手链一处固定链接出现断裂。张先生和金店交涉,负责人出具了“同意另行订制同样款式手链一根”的承诺书。然而,金店一直
Last March 15 last year, the newly amended “Consumer Protection Law” came into effect, but most people ignored the Supreme Court’s “Provisions on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Food and Drug Disputes Cases” (the “ Judicial Interpretation of Food and Drugs ”), the following typical cases can be effective consumer advocacy Weaponry. [Case 1] gold bracelet only a few days to break, who is responsible? Zhang spent 26,900 yuan to buy a gold bracelet for men, just wearing four days, bracelet a fixed link broken. Zhang negotiated with the gold shop, the responsible person issued “agreed to be the same custom a bracelet ” commitment book. However, the gold shop has been