论文部分内容阅读
自1962年出版的UCP290号出版物开始,开证行在判定一项请求是否与信用证条款一致这个问题上,就被施加了一些责任。这些责任在1983年出版的UCP400 号出版物中被进一步加强,并在1993年的UCP500号出版物中被制定得更为严格。简而言之,如果开证行决定拒绝付款,它不仅有责任不延误地通过迅捷的手段将全部不符点通知单据的提示者,而且有责任说明它将退回单据还是将代为保管单据听候提示者的指示。如果开证行未能遵循这些责任中的任何一项,其拒绝付款的权利就会被排除。
Since publication UCP290, published in 1962, the issuing bank has imposed some liability in determining whether a request is consistent with the letter of credit. These responsibilities were further strengthened in the UCP 400 publication published in 1983 and more rigorously set forth in the 1993 UCP 500 publication. In short, if the issuing bank decides to refuse payment, it not only has the responsibility not only to promptly notify the notifying party of the discrepancies promptly and without delay, but also to indicate whether it will return the documents or to keep the documents on their behalf The instructions. If the issuing bank fails to comply with any of these responsibilities, its right to refuse payment will be excluded.