论文部分内容阅读
本文将我国现行的基金评审体制与美、德等国家的基金评审体制进行了比较,结合科学家对基金评审反馈的意见和建议,对进一步改进评审质量的可能措施进行了讨论,并提出如下建议:(1)适时修订申请书撰写提纲和评议要点,注意两者更好地衔接;(2)多管齐下,更准确地选择专家进行评审;(3)更有效地保护非共识思想;(4)进一步提高评审程序透明性。
This paper compares the current fund reviewing system in our country with the fund reviewing system in the United States, Germany and other countries. Based on the opinions and suggestions of scientists on the review and appraisal of funds, the paper discusses the possible measures to further improve the quality of reviewing, and puts forward the following suggestions: (1) revise the outline of the application timely and comment on the points, pay attention to the two better convergence; (2) multi-pronged, more accurate selection of experts for review; (3) more effective protection of non-consensus ideas; (4) Further improve the transparency of the review process.