论文部分内容阅读
本文以目的原则为基础,对法庭问答互动中话语标记语应用进行了分析研究。力图揭示参与者在法庭问答互动中是在不同的目的关系和互动中如何使用话语标记语这一策略实现其话语目的。通过对几个案例的定性分析发现,法庭问答互动中使用话语标记语要有选择性,根据不同的情况选择合适的标记语,以免使语言显得缺乏力量,不易令人信服,正确选择话语标记语对法庭参与人员都具有一定的参考作用。
Based on the principle of purpose, this paper analyzes and discusses the application of discourse markers in the courtroom question-answer interaction. Trying to reveal the participants’ purpose of discourse in the question-answer interaction of courtrooms by using discourse markers in different purposes and interactions. Through the qualitative analysis of several cases, it is found that the use of discourse markers in the court’s question-answer interaction should be selective and appropriate markers should be chosen according to different situations so as to avoid the lack of power in the language and make it difficult to be convincing and correctly choose discourse markers The court participants have a certain reference.