近来,常见刊头报端登载群众影评中佼佼者的传记,几经品尝,颇觉有些“跑味”,便生出些感慨。 声明在无:本人亦是“群众影评”阵营中一无名小卒,虽也胡乱写了数十篇勉强可称之为“影评”的东西,却不敢声称“佼佼者”,更不曾奢望某为本人树碑立传。诚然,再平凡普通的人也会在身后留下一笔的,问题在于:谁来写?写的谁?怎样写?值不值得写? 我认为群众影评之所以成了气候,其主要原因在于它的群众性,对于电影事业来说,则是它的“观众性”。观众所表现出的“参与意识”推动着观众中一批文化水平较高的人拿起笔,拉开电影批语的架式,于是,群众影评应运而生。然而,无论从写作技巧上,电影文化上,功底还很不扎实,本应实实在在地多读、多看、多写、如此急匆匆地涂脂抹粉、树碑立伟似乎不妥,难道不怕盛名之下,其实难副么?这是值不值写的一面。 Recently, the most common print headlines published biography of the best in the critics of the masses. After quite a few tastings, they felt somewhat “runaway” and gave birth to some emotion. The statement is no: I am also a “mass critics” camp in a nobody, although also casually wrote dozens of articles can barely be called “critics”, but did not dare to claim “leader”, but did not expect someone Tree monument rumors. Admittedly, ordinary people will be left behind, the question is: Who wrote? Who wrote? How to write? Worth writing? I think the reason why mass critics has become climate, the main reason is that Its mass, for the movie business, is its “spectator.” The audience’s “sense of participation” promoted a group of audience with a higher level of education to pick up the pen, opened the frame of film criticism, so mass criticism came into being. However, no matter from the writing skills, the film culture, the foundation is still not solid, should actually read more, see more, write more, so hurried lipstick, tree Liwei seems improper, is not afraid of prestigious Under the fact, it is difficult to do it? This is worth writing side.