《小学教学研究》86年第12期吴道兴同志《<我要的是葫芦>主题探讨》一文(以下称《探讨》)是对该刊85年第4期张兴华、缪明华同志《<我要的是葫芦>浅析》(下称《浅析》)一文提出不同的看法。《探讨》认为:《浅析》对该文主题的归纳(其实也是教学目的要求)只考虑编者的编排意图,虽未违背教材内容。却脱离了学生实际,偏深、偏难,通过教学难以达到二年级学生认识世间事物是互相联系的哲理的要求。 The article “Discussion on the Theme of” I Want is a Gourd> “by Comrade Wu Dao-xing is a reference to Comrade Zhang Xinghua and Miao Minghua 85 Gourd> Analysis ”(hereinafter referred to as“ Analysis ”) a different view. “Discussion” that: “Analysis” of the theme of the induction (in fact, teaching requirements) only consider the editor's intent to arrange, although not contrary to the textbook content. But divorced from the reality of the students, deep, difficult, difficult to achieve through the teaching of sophomores to recognize the world things are interconnected philosophy requirements.