某日向王萍导演求教。漫谈中,老太太突然自语道:“怎么好些电影剧本都爱一开头儿先写一段戏,然后再出片名呢?”语气中颇多憾意。近来得暇,为着学习,集中读了一批电影文学剧本。佳作甚多,读后获益匪浅。不过掩卷之余.王萍同志的那句话却蓦地兜上心头。象是彼此约好似的,许多剧本果然是开篇先写一大段戏,然后是: 画面定格,急速推出片名; 缓缓推出片名,演职员表; 片名从狂风暴雨中急推而出; 慢慢化出一行翠绿色的大字片名; ……为着新颖?怕是反见落俗。为了“电影化”?似乎并非一定如此而无电影化。还是为了什么?不得知。这种出现片名的手法,原是无可厚非的。用得好,其艺术效果自不消说。只不过一旦“所见略同”,却又成了一种模式。中外许多优秀影片,并未证明此种手法是不二法门的。由此,忆起一桩往事。 One day seek advice to Wang Ping director. Talk about the old lady suddenly said to myself: “how good the movie script love a beginning first write a play, and then a title?” Tone of many regret. Recently had time, for learning, read a group of concentrated film literary script. Many masterpieces, after reading profitable. However, while covering up, Comrade Wang Ping said nothing but his heart. As if each other about the same, many scripts really is the beginning of the first to write a large section, and then: screen freeze frame, the rapid introduction of film titles; slowly introduction of titles, credits; title rush from the storm out ; Slowly turn out a line of emerald big names; ... ... for the new fear? For “cinema” does not seem to necessarily be the case without cinema. Or for what? Do not know. This appearance of the name of the original approach, it is understandable. Used well, its artistic effect Needless to say. Only once “see the same,” but has become a model. Many excellent Chinese and foreign films have not proved that this tactic is the only one. From this, recalls a past.