杨先武在观摩过多次《孤独之旅》教学公开课后,提出了他的疑惑:一个未成年的孩子应该默默地去承受这样的孤独吗?他的“成长”是健康的成长吗?为何多个教学镜头都在为杜小康的“孤独之旅”大唱赞歌,为他的“成长”齐声叫好?他针对《草房子》文本进行分析,认为杜小康的苦难来源于父亲,是本可以避免的一场人为制造的苦难。作为执教者理应了解这样的背景,并给学生们作一些介绍和引导。但这 Yang Xianwu visited many times after the “solitary journey” teaching open class, put forward his doubts: a minor child should silently to withstand such a loneliness? His “growth” is a healthy growth? Why did a number of teaching videos sing praise for Du Xiaokang ’s “Lonely Journey” and applaud his “Growth ” in unison? He analyzed the text of “Grass House” and concluded that Du Xiaokang’s source of misery In the father, is a man-made misery that can be avoided. As a coaching staff should understand this background, and give students some introduction and guidance. But this