文学主体性问题是一个十分重要的问题。文学这种特殊的精神劳动,非常需要思想和幻想、内容和形式的广阔天地,创作主体在这种精神劳动中起着至关重要的作用。提出文学主体性问题是有意义的。过去在一段时间里,“左”的文艺指导思想束缚了作家主体性的发挥,对文艺的繁荣产生了有害的影响。此外,我们在文艺理论的研究中,主体性理论的建设方面相对说来还是一个比较薄弱的环节,需要加强这方面的理论研究和理论建设。问题在于我们究竟是以马克思主义为指导科学地正确地阐明文学主体性问题,还是以西方资产阶级的理论主张为依据,把主体性问题的研究引向邪路。刘再复的“文学主体性”理论背离了马列主义、毛 Literary subjectivity is a very important issue. Literature, a special kind of spiritual work, is in great need of a vast world of ideas and fantasies, contents and forms. The subject of creation plays a crucial role in such spiritual work. It is significant to raise the issue of literary subjectivity. In the past period of time, the “leftist” literary and art guiding ideology restrained the writer’s subjectivity from exerting a detrimental influence on the prosperity of literature and art. In addition, in the study of literary theory, the construction of subjectivity theory is still a relatively weak link, and we need to strengthen theoretical research and theoretical construction in this respect. The question is whether we should correctly and correctly interpret literary subjectivity under the guidance of Marxism or based on the theoretical claims of the western bourgeoisie and lead the study of subjectivity issues to the wrong path. Liu Zaifu’s theory of “literary subjectivity” deviated from Marxism-Leninism-Mao