论文部分内容阅读
多年来,对于金属物性变化的解释及其表明方式,除众所周知的《元素周期表》法外,曾从不同角度提出过很多方法和经验公式,Wigner、Seitz从电子运动的Schrodingr方程直接求解计算了碱金属的内聚能,Mott、Slater等用能带模型解释金属的电导及磁性,Jones用电子浓度阐明了金属的晶体结构,以及前人所建立的有关金属单项物性的经验方程式等等。1974年,Grimvall又从Debye温度观点提出与金属物性相关联的问题~1,1976年,Самсонов等又从电子定位的角度解释金属的许多物性。解释金属物性变化的方法和经验公式尽管很多,但是分析和比较以后表明,这些方法及经验公式的处理结果和实验事实间都出现不同程度的矛盾,而且对过渡金属都感到
Over the years, many methods and empirical formulas have been proposed from different perspectives in addition to the well-known “Periodic Table” method for the explanation of metallic physical changes and their way of expression. Wigner and Seitz solved directly from the Schrodingr equation of electron motion Alkali cohesive energy, Mott, Slater and other energy band model to explain the conductance and magnetism, Jones electron concentration elucidated the crystal structure of the metal, as well as the previously established empirical formula on the physical properties of metals and so on. In 1974, Grimvall again raised the issue of metal properties associated with the Debye temperature. 1 In 1976, Moscow further explained many properties of metals from the perspective of electron localization. Although there are many methods and empirical formulas to explain the changes of metal physical properties, the analysis and comparison show that there are different degrees of contradictions between the results of these methods and empirical formulas and the experimental facts, and all of the transition metals are felt