我们认为:对于学生作文,还是要篇篇都改、都评,解决困难的办法不是自改、互改,略改、不改。或改二分之一,而在于如何放低评语的尺度,克服评语的“高、大、全”之弊。什么是评语的“高、大、全”之弊呢?简而言之,即过份强调文章的立意要高远,卒章显其志,以小见大,每份评语从书写、字词、语言等等各个方面,对学生的作文作全面评析。教师的评语对学生的写作是一种诱导、启发、点拨,它是学生今后写作的指南、依据,是学生调整自己写作思路的扶手。而“高、大、全”的评语,只能使学生产生一 We believe that for the students’ composition, they must change and comment on the articles. The solution to the difficulties is not self-reform, mutual reform, slight reform, and no change. Or change one-half, but it is how to lower the scale of the comment and overcome the disadvantages of the “high, big, and all” of the comment. What is the disadvantage of the “high, big, and all” of the comments? In short, the emphasis on the article’s conception is to be far-reaching. All aspects of language, etc., make a comprehensive assessment of the student’s composition. The teacher’s comments are a kind of inducement, inspiration, and encouragement to students’ writing. It is the guide and basis for students’ future writing, and is the handrail for students to adjust their writing ideas. And “high, big, and full” reviews can only produce one