职工教育究竟是有为才有位,有位才有为,还是有为的同时也要有位?职教同行相当一部份同志认为有为才有位,即通过努力工作去争取职教工作的地位。但也有人指出,倘或说有为才有位正确,又何尝不可说有位才有为也不错呢?孔夫子不也说过:“名不正言不顺,言不顺则事不成”吗?其辩证观点是,有为的同时才有位,有位的同时也要有为,不管是看重“为”还是看重“位”都是不科学的。这样看似乎对“为”与“位”的辩证关系谈得比较全面。但 Is there any workforce education that has a job, a job-only education, or a job-oriented education? A considerable number of our colleagues in vocational education believe that there is only one job, that is, work hard to win the job of vocational education Position. However, it was also pointed out that if there is a right or a right one, why can not one say that one is good enough? Confucius also did not say: “The name is not correct, ill-prepared, then it fails”? The dialectical point of view is that there is only one thing at the same time, and one thing at the same time. Whether it means valuing “as” or valuing “position” is unscientific. In this way, it seems that the dialectical relationship between “as” and “position” is more comprehensive. but