论文部分内容阅读
本文为诺诶尔·卡洛尔著《经典电影理论中的哲学问题》中的第二章第二节,现仍以第一节标题为全文标题(作者简况、该书简介及第二章第一节请见本刊上期),文中各小标题前的序号为译者所加。继该章第一节《巴赞在电影理论中的地位》对巴赞的理论全貌进行了概括分析并对其理论价值和历史贡献作出评估之后,本节重点分析枇评了巴赞理论的失误之处。在这方面,本文的特点有这么几个:一,在论证过程中,作者特别以形式逻辑分析的方法指出,巴赞(包括当代巴赞论者如卡维尔等人)提出的电影影象本体论存在着逻辑上的重大破绽,这至使人们从巴赞理论出发只能得出荒谬的结论从而无法解决虚构电影中的再现问题。二,作者通过逻辑分析揭露了巴赞理论中存在的本质性错误。即,巴赞在再现、再次呈现,现实、现实主义等等概念上的含混根源于巴赞理论方向的失误:巴赞从纪实影片的历史出发却企图归纳出似乎可以一次确定电影本性的超历史的电影技巧。三,作者结合相似性美学理论之长,避其之短,对巴赞理论的失误提出了具有一定说服力的修正意见。此外,作者以知觉经验为根据对巴赞本体论所做的批判,对我们从认识论角度了解影象本体论在哲学上的谬误会提供不少启发。
This article is Part II of Part II of Noel Carroll’s “Philosophical Issues in Classical Film Theory”, and is still based on the title of the full title in the first section (brief introduction of the author, Please refer to the previous issue of this issue), the serial numbers of the subheadings in the text are added by the translator. Following the first section of the chapter entitled “Barzan’s Position in Film Theory”, after a general analysis of Bazin’s theoretical picture and an assessment of its theoretical value and historical contribution, this section focuses on analyzing the failure of Bazin’s theory Where. In this respect, the characteristics of this article are as follows: First, in the process of argumentation, the author points out, in particular, by the way of formal logic analysis that the movie image itself proposed by Bazin (including contemporary Bazar and others) On the other hand, there is a major flaw in logic, which makes it impossible to solve the problem of reproduction in fictional films from the conclusion of Barzan’s theory that only leads to absurd conclusions. Second, the author reveals the essential errors existing in Bazin’s theory through logical analysis. That is, Bazin’s mistaking concept of reproduction, reappearance, reality, realism and so on is rooted in the direction of Bazin’s theory: From the history of documentary films, Bazin attempts to conclude the hyper-history which seems to determine movie nature at once Movie skills. Third, the author combines the similarities and aesthetics of the length of the theory, to avoid the short, the theory of Bazin mistakes made with some convincing amendments. In addition, the author’s critique of Bazin’s ontology based on perceptual experience provides us with much inspiration for us to understand the philosophical fallacy of the ontology of the image from the perspective of epistemology.