理论价值观是社会尤其该学科的理论家们在认同科学理论时的观念。这种观念在科学界审视学科发展趋向,选择科研课题,评判和奖励科学成果时体现出来。随着社会的进步,理论价值观也要变化。社会对科学的推动力,可以通过理论价值观问接实现。中国社会科学中一度盛行唯圣唯上的理论价值观。圣贤或先人的思想制约着人们对理论的评价。中国图书馆学当然不能例外。幸而尽管图书馆学有意作政治的俾女,.政治对图书馆学却不屑顾及。领袖们极少过问图书馆问题,所以十年前批“两个凡是”,在图书馆学界并不困难。然而,中国图书馆学毕竟承袭了久远的理论遗产。在汲取古代图书馆学精华的同时,不可避免地接受了传统的理论价值标准。传统理论价值观为核心,是重理论的自身形 Theoretical values ​​are the notion that the society, especially the theorists of this subject, agree with the scientific theory. This notion is reflected in the scientific community when it examines the trend of discipline development, selects scientific research topics, and judges and rewards scientific achievements. As society progresses, the theoretical values ​​will also change. Social impetus to science can be achieved through theoretical values. In the Chinese social sciences, the only theoretical values ​​that prevailed on the only and only sacred. The ideas of saints or ancestors constrain people’s assessment of theory. Of course, Chinese library science can not be an exception. Fortunately, although library science is intended to serve as a political service girl, politics ignores library science. Leaders rarely ask questions about the library, so criticizing the “two generals” ten years ago is not difficult in the field of library science. However, after all, Chinese library science inherited a long theoretical legacy. Draw the essence of ancient library science, inevitably accepted the traditional theoretical value standards. Traditional theoretical values ​​as the core, is the theory of self-shape