「笔迹鉴定」是刑事侦察的一种手段,自有其技术的准确性与实用性,在公安工作中行之有效。但是,同样完全靠目测和经验的「笔迹鉴定」,是否可以代替我国的一门形成千年的书画鉴定学科呢?国家文物鉴定委员的机构设置是否必要呢?一场被极少数别有用心的书坛弄臣式人物所挑拨而起诉讼,以其伪学术行为介入学术之争,引起了广大学者的极度不满。本刊为此专门采访我国著名书画艺术家和鉴定家,他们的真知与睿见,不仅可以摒弃无知,也有益于书画鉴定学科的学术探讨。现刊载如下,以飨读者。 “Handwriting identification” is a means of criminal investigation. It has its own technical accuracy and practicability and is effective in public security work. However, is it entirely possible that the “handwriting identification” based entirely on visual inspection and experience can replace one of our country’s disciplines of painting and calligraphy that have become a thousand years of history? Is it necessary to set up the institutions of national cultural relics appraisal members? Swear-style characters provoked by the lawsuit, with its pseudo-academic intervention in the academic controversy, caused the majority of scholars extreme dissatisfaction. This magazine specifically interviewed the famous Chinese calligraphy and painting artists and appraisers, their true knowledge and Rui see, not only can give up the ignorance, but also conducive to academic evaluation of calligraphy and painting appraisal. Now published as follows to readers.