论文部分内容阅读
目的总结分析腹腔镜全子宫切除术与开腹全子宫切除术的临床价值。方法选择2010年6月至2013年10月长葛市人民医院收治的72例需择期实施全子宫切除手术的患者为研究对象,按术式分为观察组(腹腔镜全子宫切除术)和对照组(开腹全子宫切除术),每组36例,比较两组患者的手术疗效、手术并发症等情况。结果观察组手术出血量[(95.7±10.7)ml]、住院时间[(4.6±1.5)d]均明显优于对照组[(124.6±14.7)ml、(7.5±2.9)d],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论与开腹全子宫切除术相比,腹腔镜全子宫切除术具有出血量少、手术并发症低、术后胃肠功能恢复快等优势,同时具有可延缓卵巢功能衰竭的功效,临床值得推广使用。
Objective To summarize and analyze the clinical value of laparoscopic hysterectomy and open hysterectomy. Methods From June 2010 to October 2013, 72 patients undergoing total hysterectomy in Changge People’s Hospital were enrolled and divided into observation group (laparoscopic hysterectomy) and control group Group (open hysterectomy), 36 cases in each group. The curative effect and complications of the two groups were compared. Results The bleeding volume of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group [(95.7 ± 10.7) ml] and length of stay [(4.6 ± 1.5) d] [(124.6 ± 14.7) ml and (7.5 ± 2.9) d] Significance (P <0.05). Conclusion Compared with open hysterectomy, laparoscopic hysterectomy has the advantages of less bleeding, low operative complications and quick recovery of postoperative gastrointestinal function, and has the effect of delaying ovarian failure and is worthy of clinical promotion use.