论文部分内容阅读
金岳霖先生在《中国哲学》一文曾指出,中国哲学家基本上是哲学和政治统一的,“属于苏格拉底、柏拉图那一类”。可是现代人的分工,却造就了“超脱研究对象”的“职业哲学家”。后一种哲学家在中国是新生代,改用现代话是“为哲学而哲学”或“为学术而学术”:“他推理、论证,但是并不传道”。如果从这点上来看金岳霖与冯友兰的区别,是很明显的:金《论道》并不传道,而冯则传道:“为万世开太平”。汪子嵩先生文《“海阔天空我自飞”》(《读书》一九九五年第四期)对金、冯差异的这种分析是独到而精确的,这不仅有学理文本的依据,也有做他们学生的亲身体验,当属可信。
In his article “Chinese Philosophy,” Mr. Jin Yuelin once pointed out that Chinese philosophers are basically philosophical and political unification, “belonging to the class of Socrates and Plato.” However, the division of labor of modern people has created “professional philosophers” who are “detached from the research object.” The latter philosophers are new-generation in China. It is “philosophical and philosophical” or “academic and academic” if they switch to modern ones: “He reasoned, justified, but did not preach.” From this point of view, the difference between Jin Yuelin and Feng Youlan is obvious: Jin’s “theory of Tao” is not preached, but Feng preaches: “peace for the world.” Mr. Wang Zisong’s article “” My brighter future “(” Reading "fourth issue in 1995) This analysis of gold and von is unique and precise, which not only has the basis of the academic text, but also has done The personal experience of their students is truly trustworthy.