论文部分内容阅读
“某些企业”是WTO《补贴与反补贴措施协定》专向性标准的核心概念,但缺乏明确界定。“某些企业”解释的难点在于“产业”和“一组产业”这两个范畴,美欧反补贴法对此没有明确的客观标准,WTO争端解决机构通过的报告也缺乏明确的法律指引。“产业”的解释应当以“相同产品”为基础,构成“一组产业”诸产业之间不需要以共同性为纽带,但应当设定实体和程序标准加以限定。WTO应通过多种途径明确“某些企业”的法律含义,其中我国应当有所作为。
“Some enterprises ” is the core concept of the WTO-specific standards for the agreement on subsidies and countervailing measures, but it lacks a clear definition. “Some enterprises ” The difficulty of interpretation is that “industry ” and “a group of industries ” these two areas, the United States and Europe anti-subsidy law there is no clear objective standard for this, the WTO Dispute Settlement Agency adopted the report Lack of clear legal guidance. The interpretation of “industry” should be based on “identical products” and constitute a “group of industries.” There is no need for commonality as a link between industries, but substantive and procedural standards should be set. The WTO should clarify the legal implications of “certain enterprises” through a variety of channels, of which China should do something.