《管子·侈靡》篇素称难读。明刘绩言“此篇多错简,不可读”;朱长春说“《侈靡》大奇,宿儒难解”。郭沫若《管子集校》作通篇校理,又撰长文《侈靡篇的研究》分析剖判,筚路蓝缕之功卓然。然而我对郭沫若考定该文作于公元前190年前后西汉孝惠吕后时代,作者是荀子弟子李斯的门人或门下客周容子夏的断语颇存疑谳,故谨陈管见如次。 “Pipe extravagant” articles, said hard to read. Ming Liu Ci Yan “This article more wrong Jane, unreadable ”; Zhu Changchun said “” extravagant “big odd, accommodation Confucianism difficult ”. Guo Moruo “tube set school” for the whole school, but also the long article “extravagant articles of the” analysis of anatomical judgment, Qiluqiaoluzhuangzhangran. However, I consider this article by Guo Moruo before and after the pre-1902 BC Xiaogu Luxi era, the author is a disciple of Xunzi Li Si’s door or off the door, Zhou Rongzi summer is quite suspense, so Chen tube see the same.