论文部分内容阅读
本文对经皮肾镜碎石取石术和经尿道输尿管镜碎石术治疗输尿管上段结石进行对比,报告如下。1资料与方法1.1临床资料选取2012年5月至2014年5月来我院治疗输尿管上段结石的患者86例,其中,男66例,女20例,年龄19~68岁,平均(43.20±24.03)岁;所有患者均行泌尿系统超声检查及腹部平片及尿路造影检查,结石大小1.1cm×0.6cm~2.4cm×1.3cm;单侧71例,双侧15例。将上述86例输尿管上段结石患者按随机对照法分为对照组(n=43)和实验组(n=43),两组一般资料比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),具有可比性。
This article on percutaneous nephrolithotripsy and transurethral ureteroscopic lithotripsy for the treatment of upper ureteral calculi were compared, the report is as follows. 1 Materials and Methods 1.1 Clinical data selected from May 2012 to May 2014 to our hospital for the treatment of upper ureteral calculi in 86 patients, including 66 males and 20 females, aged 19 to 68 years, with an average (43.20 ± 24.03 ) Years of age; all patients underwent urinary system ultrasound and abdominal plain film and urography examination, the size of stones 1.1cm × 0.6cm ~ 2.4cm × 1.3cm; unilateral 71 cases, bilateral in 15 cases. The 86 patients with upper ureteral calculi were randomly divided into control group (n = 43) and experimental group (n = 43). There was no significant difference between the two groups (P> 0.05).