我国内地的民法典总则之草案在众人协力之下,总算在夏日炎炎中粉墨登场,与此同时,该草案也未辜负此火热之氛围,面对这秀色可餐的美食,对此有兴趣的人仿如饕餮之徒,分而食之,个中滋味,酸甜苦辣,甚嚣尘上。在澳门特区天高地远,于是借手头的澳门民法典,对其作出一番比较,不求甚解,但求比较得清晰,比较得有眉目。本文采用的是整体比较之方式,主要对象是自然人之人格(权)。一、《澳门民法典》总则中的人格及人格权设置结构 Under the concerted efforts of all, the draft Civil Code of the Mainland finally made its appearance in the hot summer. At the same time, the draft lawsuit has not let up the fiery atmosphere. In the face of this delicious food, people who are interested in it Such as gluttonous, divide and eat, a taste, ups and downs, rampant. In the MSAR, the heights of the Earth are far away. Therefore, we can make some comparisons and no solutions with the Macao Civil Code at hand. However, it is clearer and more obvious. This article uses the overall comparison, the main object is the personality of the natural person (right). First, the “Macao Civil Code” in the general rules of personality and personality right to set the structure