本文开篇就指明对玩忽职守罪行为方式存在的不同认识,通过对作为与不作为的界定标准的分析,论述了玩忽职守行为方式只能是不作为,且这种不作为要构成玩忽职守罪所必须具备的条件,并指出虽系不作为犯罪,但具有与作为型犯罪同罚性的特征,得出玩忽职守罪系不作为型犯罪的结论。 At the outset of this paper, we point out the different understanding of the ways of neglecting duty. By analyzing the definition of the act of omission, it is argued that negligence can only be omission and that omission constitutes negligence It also points out that though it is not committed as a crime, it has the same characteristics as the type of crime, and concludes that dereliction of duty is not committed as a crime.