论文部分内容阅读
楊起元是晚明陽明學泰州學派一系的代表人物,有著豐富的《孝經》學著述。但自明末以來關於楊起元《孝經》學著述的著録多有不當甚至錯誤之處,而楊起元的《孝經注》一書則幾乎爲歷史所遺忘。因此,很有必要對此作一番“正名”的工作。《孝經注》是融匯三教以解《孝經》的典範著作,其内容與楊起元其他著作中的思想一致,爲楊起元所作當無疑。明代經學以往被視爲衰微,但若不抱漢學的門户之見,我們仍可看到明代經學的獨特性所在。以陽明學派的《孝經》學爲例,即可窺知。
Yang Qiyuan is a representative of the late Ming Yang Ming Taizhou School, has a wealth of “Book of Filial Piety” study. However, since the end of the Ming Dynasty, there has been some improper or even wrong description about the writing of “Book of Filial Piety” by Yang Qiyuan, while the book of filial piety by Yang Qiyuan is almost forgotten by history. Therefore, it is necessary to make some “correct name” work. The Book of Filial Piety is a model work that integrates the three religions to solve the Book of Filial Piety. Its contents are consistent with those in other works by Yang Qiyuan, and no doubt when done by Yang Qiyuan. In the past, the classics of the Ming dynasty were considered as declining, but we can still see the uniqueness of the classics in the Ming dynasty if we did not hold the view of Han dynasty. Take the “Book of Filial Piety” of Yangming School as an example, you can see.