论文部分内容阅读
由于传统的理论将治理结构分为“等级、市场”或是“股权、非股权”等,而这些分类方式并不能充分描述研发联盟治理结构的特点,因此本研究首先解释在研发联盟当中,为何必须存在不同的组织治理结构类型;继而探讨在面对不同特性的研发联盟时,如何选择适当的治理结构类型.结合交易成本经济学理论与资源基础观点,推导出影响研发联盟组织治理结构的6个主要因子,分别为技术不确定性、文化差异、资产特殊性、技术的互补性、个别公司独门技术的研发专用性、信任,据此建立本研究模型.当研发联盟的技术不确定性较高、文化差异较大、独门技术的研发专用性有较多的防范时,则采用非集中联盟;当研发联盟的资产特殊性较高、技术的互补性较大、伙伴之间的信任度较高时,则采用集中联盟.搭配这些因子的特性选择组织治理结构类型,则研发联盟有更好的绩效,反之亦然.
Because the traditional theory divides the governance structure into “rank, market ” or “equity, non-equity ” and so on, and these classification methods do not fully describe the characteristics of R & D alliance governance structure, How to choose the proper type of governance structure in the face of different R & D alliances.Combined with the theory of transaction cost economics and the resource-based point of view, it is derived that the impact of R & D alliance organizations The six main factors of governance structure are the technical uncertainty, cultural differences, asset specificity, the complementarity of technologies, the exclusive R & D expertise of individual companies, and the establishment of this research model.When the R & D alliances Uncertainty is high, the cultural differences are large, and the exclusive R & D of the unique technology has more precautions, the non-centralized alliance is adopted. When the R & D alliance has higher asset specificity and greater technical complementarity, Of the trust, then the use of centralized alliances with the characteristics of these factors choose the type of organizational structure, the R & D alliance has a better Effect, and vice versa.