论文部分内容阅读
从去年七月十七日到十月,《河北农民报》举办了一个《讨论会》,讨论的题目是《是当“李双双式”的干部,还是当“孙喜旺式”的干部?》历时两个多月,共出了十九期。这个《讨论会》,受到了广大生产队干部和社员的欢迎。讨论期间共收到来信来稿二千一百多件,其中:县和公社干部给队干部、社员代笔写的文章占百分之十,社员自己写的占百分之三十七,队干部自己写的占百分之五十三。这次讨论,帮助队干部和社员认清了当“李双双”式还是当“孙喜旺”式的干部,这不光是个脾气性格问题,工作方法问题,更重要的是阶级立场问题;批判了资产阶级个人主义的人生观,发扬了全心全意为人民服务的无产阶级人生观。有些生产队干部把这次讨论会比做是一次“思想比赛会”、“革命促进会”;有的把《讨论会》比做是“一杆大秤”,
From July 17 to October last year, Hebei Farmers’ Daily held a “seminar” on the topic of “being a cadre of” Li Shuangshuang “or a cadre of” Sun Xiwang “?” A month, a total of nineteen. This “seminar” has been greatly welcomed by cadres and members of the production team. During the discussion, a total of over 2,1900 letters were received, of which: County and commune cadres to the team cadres, members of the ghost written articles accounted for 10%, the members themselves accounted for 37% of the team cadres themselves Write fifty-three percent. This discussion helped cadres and members of the party to make clear whether the “Li Shuangshuang” or “Sun Xiwang” cadres were not only a temper personality issue, a working method issue, but more importantly, a class standpoint; a criticism of the bourgeois individual Doctrine of outlook on life, and carry forward the proletarian outlook on life that serves the people wholeheartedly. Some cadres at the production team compared the symposium to “an ideological meeting” and “a revolutionary association.” Some compared the “seminar” to "one scale,