陈汉生和安乐哲对中国思想的哲学解释,尤其是对庄子的解释,其特点在于解读上的显著不足。陈汉生从分析哲学,安乐哲从后现代主义的先入为主的理论假设出发,对庄子进行了不恰当的解释。为了理解一个特定的中国思想家,我们必须在每种情况下对应于特定的思想家而开发出一种解读方式。以庄子的情况为例,我们的任务是发展出一种能够理解庄子的非理解的诠释学。我们的解读方式应该顺着一个特定的文本给我们提供的线索,它不应该被一个一般的理论所规定。 Chen Hansheng and An Le Zhe’s philosophical explanation of Chinese thought, especially Zhuangzi’s interpretation, is characterized by a marked lack of interpretation. Chen Hansheng started his analysis of the philosophical and An Lezhe from the preconceived notion of postmodernism and gave an inappropriate explanation to Chuang Tzu. In order to understand a particular Chinese thinker, we must develop a way of reading that corresponds to a particular thinker in each case. Taking Chuang Tzu’s case as an example, our task is to develop a non-understanding hermeneutics that can understand Zhuang Tzu. Our interpretation should follow the clues given to a particular piece of text, which should not be dictated by a general theory.