论文部分内容阅读
在中国传统司法的研究中,一个颇为引人关注问题是,不少学者开始对现有的以西方司法理论为基础的研究范式进行反思和争论。究其原因,主要是因为在以西方的司法理论来解释中国问题时,由于各自背后的社会与文化的差异没有得到足够的重视,从而导致相关理论的解释力遭到人们的质疑。本文认为当代传统司法的研究正处于一个范式转型期,随着“超越西方”、“回归本土”等主张的提出,新的研究范式将有助于人们发现以往研究的缺陷,在此基础上提出新的概念、理论来推进传统司法的研究。在此背景下,本文也重新考察了“传统司法”这个概念并对其做了新的解读。
A rather interesting issue in the study of Chinese traditional jurisprudence is that many scholars have begun to rethink and debate the existing research paradigms based on Western judicial theory. The reason is mainly because when explaining the Chinese issue with Western judicial theory, due to the difference of social and cultural differences behind each other, they have not been given enough attention, which led to the questioning of the explanatory power of the relevant theories. This paper argues that the study of contemporary traditional jurisprudence is in the midst of a paradigm shift. With the propositions of “Beyond the West ” and “Returning to the Home ”, the new research paradigm will help people discover the defects of past research. Based on this, new concepts and theories are put forward to promote the study of traditional justice. In this context, this article also re-examined the concept of “traditional justice” and made a new interpretation of it.