虽然七七事变前日本侵华政策是一个不使人感到陌生的题目,但从目前的研究中仍能看到有些概念不够明确,有些理解囿于某种定式的现象。对此,本文将谈点一孔之得。一日本“分治华北”的政策起于何时有的文章把“分治华北”与华北自治运动”混为一谈,认为《塘沽协定》时,日本并未形成“分治华北”的政策。此说不妥。日本图谋华北,其来有渐。大量的历史材料说明,日本对与“满洲国”相毗邻的华北甚为关切。重光葵承认对华北的“政治工作”“是在建立 Although the policy of Japan’s aggression against China before the Sept 7 Incident was a non-unfamiliar topic, we can still see from the current study some concepts that are not sufficiently clear and that some understand it in a certain way. In this regard, this article will talk about the hole. When a policy of “dividing and ruling North China” originated in Japan confused the “dividing the North China with North China Autonomous Movement” and considered the “Tanggu Agreement,” Japan did not form a “divide and rule North China” policy. It is not proper for Japan to plot North China, but a great deal of historical material shows that Japan is very much concerned about North China, which is adjacent to Manchukuo and Chong Kwok-Kui acknowledged that “political work” in North China was being established