论文部分内容阅读
本文讨论了马克思《巴黎手稿》中私有财产与异化劳动的关系,认为二者之间的关系是对立统一关系,而不是前后起源关系。把对立统一关系当作前后起源关系来研究,会形成二者循环论证的错觉。马克思强调异化劳动,是要强调对立统一体中能动的主体作用。私有财产与异化劳动都是关系范畴,而非实体范畴。对二者的理解从实体范畴上升到关系范畴,正是马克思对国民经济学的超越。对经济学研究方法的“实证主义”的指责,只适用于国民经济学,而不适用于马克思。
This article discusses the relationship between private property and alienated labor in Marx’s Paris Manuscripts and holds that the relationship between the two is a unity of opposites, not a relationship of origin. To study the relationship between the opposite unity as the origin of the relationship between the two will form the illusion of circular argument. Marx emphasizes alienated labor by emphasizing the active and dominant role of the opposition. Private property and alienated labor are all related categories, not physical ones. The understanding of the two from the entity category to the category of relations, it is Marx’s surpassing of the national economy. The accusation of “positivism” in economic research methods applies only to national economics, not to Marx.