文本、宗旨与格物之争——明代《大学》诠释的几个问题

来源 :哲学动态 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:wuhu001
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
《大学》原是《礼记》中的一篇。唐宋以后,伴随新儒学复兴运动的展开和理学的兴起,《大学》和《论语》、《中庸》、《孟子》一起被抬升至儒家经典的地位,形成所谓“四书”。宋明理学讨论的主要问题如理气、动静、心性、知行等,几乎都来自“四书”;“四书”所提供的心性论价值和作圣的工夫路径,满足了理学家资借传统以抗衡佛道二教的需要;它所体现的孔、曾、思、孟之间的思想关联也符合理学家建构儒家道统系谱的基本预设。随着朱熹《四书章句集注》被列入后世科举考试标准参考书,其理学思想被尊为官方意识形态,对“四书”的研究和诠释,形成儒家经典诠释的一个高潮。明代四书学著作远较宋元两代为多,而其中最多的则是有关《大学》的诠释之作。~([1])《大学》之所以 “University” was originally “Book of Rites” in one. After the Tang and Song Dynasties, with the unfolding of Neo- Confucian Revival Movement and the rise of Neo-Confucianism, “University” and “The Analects of Confucius”, “The Doctrine of the Mean” and “Mencius” were lifted to the status of Confucian classics to form the so-called “Four Books.” Most of the major issues discussed by the Neo-Confucianism of the Song and Ming Dynasties such as qi, movement, mind, knowledge and practice, almost all from the “Four Books”; “Four Books Tradition to contend with the need of Buddhism and Taoism; the ideological connection between Confucius, Zeng, Si and Meng embodies the basic presuppositions of Confucianism and Taoism constructed by rationalists. As Zhu Xi’s ”Four Books and Ancestral Annotations“ is included in the reference books for future imperial examinations, his Neo-Confucianism has been honored as an official ideology, and the study and interpretation of the ”Four Books“ have formed a climax of Confucian classics. The four books of the Ming Dynasty books are far more than the two generations of the Song and Yuan dynasties, and most of them are about ”university“ interpretation. ~ ([1]) ”University" reason
其他文献
今年是新文化运动一百周年,新中国成立七十周年,改革开放整整四十年。为此,我们举行了各种形式的学术总结工作,提出学术研究再出发的奋斗目标。改革开放四十年,从整体上来说,
正益生素是指应用于动物体内及外界环境中正常的有益生物,经过特殊的处理和加工工艺制成的活菌制剂,是无毒、无污染的环保产品,已经广泛应用于畜牧、水产养殖业中。益生素不
期刊
在没有文字也没有图像之前,人类可能利用物象来表意和记事。这种物象表达方式积淀在一定的文化系统或人群(如无文字民族)中,即形成种种具象的甚至艺术化的形式结构及“修辞”
匈奴是古代北方的草原马背民族。马既是匈奴人主要的交通工具,又是他们生产、生活中的好伙伴,举凡狩猎、游牧、战争、娱乐等均离不开马。匈奴人及其先民在驯化野马、驾驭家马