康保成《试论陶渊明的“四皓”情结》一文认为,陶渊明诗中的“南山”指的是终南山,是暗用“南山四皓”亦即“商山四皓”的典故,从而论证陶渊明有着“四皓”情结。本文对康文认为“南山”指终南山提出了不同意见,认为“南山”实指庐山,康文以“南山”为终南山,且暗用“四皓”典故,不但不能支持他的观点,反而影响其文章的说服力。 Kang Baocheng “On Tao Yuanming’s” Si Hao “complex” that the “Nanshan” in Tao Yuanming’s poem refers to Zhongnanshan, which is an allusion of “Nanshan Sihao” or “Shangshan Sihao” Has a “Sihao” complex. This article put forward different views on Kang Nanshan that “Nanshan” refers to Zhongnanshan, which means “Nanshan” refers to Lushan, Kansu to “Nanshan” as Zhongnanshan, and secretly uses “Sihao” as an allusion. It not only can not support his viewpoint, but on the contrary The article’s persuasiveness.