如果可以说皮亚杰是一个与笛卡儿具有许多共同点的理性主义者,那么宣称皮亚杰是一个康德主义者其意义何在呢?并不奇怪,这是一个极端复杂的问题。适当的回答将需要一些区分和限定。然而我认为,皮亚杰在一些重要方面可以说是一个康德主义者,虽然在关键的方面他们也有不同(正如人们可以说德国和法国的新康德主义运动在许多基本的方面接近于康德,但也与他不同)。康德哲学中的某些基本成分完全被保留下来,有的则以修正的形式被保留,还有的被皮亚杰拒绝了。一、康德的转向根据皮亚杰的观点,英国经验论取得了重要的发生学转换,但由于这种经验论建立在认知的摹本理论基础上,因而它已被证明是不恰当的。对比而言,理性主义否定认知的摹本理论有利于赋予认识论的主体以能动的作用,但不幸的是,理性主义赋予这种认识论主体的作 If it can be said that Piaget is a rationalist who has much in common with Descartes, what is the point of calling Piaget a Kantian? Not surprisingly, it is an extremely complex issue. The appropriate answer will need some differentiation and qualification. However, I think Piaget can be said to be a Kantian in some important respects, albeit in a crucial way as they are (as one might argue that the neo-Kantian movements of Germany and France are close to Kant in many fundamental respects Also different from him). Some basic elements of Kant’s philosophy were completely preserved, while others were preserved in a modified form, while others were rejected by Piaget. I. The Kant’s Shift According to Piaget’s point of view, the British empiricism has made an important transformation of occurrence and learning. However, this empiricism has proved to be inappropriate because it is based on the theory of cognitive copy. In contrast, the rationalist theory of negation of the facsimile of knowledge contributes to giving an active part to epistemological subjects, but unfortunately rationalism confers on this epistemological subject