论文部分内容阅读
李裕德同志相继技表了两篇文章;《语文教学所需要的逻辑》和《语文教学与多标准分类法》(分别载《中学语文教学》1991年第1期和第4期)。作者说:在“语文学(包括词汇学、语法学、修辞学、文章学、文学)、语文教学和教育学之类”学科中,“传统逻辑基本上不能用”,“基本上无法使用”。作者认为,“在分类标准问题上,这点体现得再明显不过了”,在这里“一次划分往往要使用两个或更多的标准”。对于李文的这些意见,笔者不敢苟同。我们知道,传统逻辑(即形式逻辑)以思维的逻辑形式及其基本规律和简单逻辑方法为其研究对象,因而它与一切科学研究和日常思维中
Comrade Li Yude has two articles in succession; “the logic required by Chinese teaching” and “Chinese teaching and multi-standard classification” (respectively, “Chinese Language Teaching” 1991 the first and fourth). The author states that in the disciplines “Chinese (including lexmatics, grammar, rhetoric, essay, literature), language teaching and pedagogy,” the traditional logic can not be basically used “and” basically can not be used “ . The author argues that ”this is evident on the issue of taxonomy, where two or more criteria are often used". For Li Wen’s comments, I disagree. We know that the traditional logic (that is, formal logic) is based on the logical form of thinking and its basic laws and simple logical methods as its object of study. Therefore, it is consistent with all scientific research and daily thinking