论文部分内容阅读
在民事审判实践中,对于被告所作的否定性主张表示究竟如何看待,直接影响案件的裁判结果,尤其在发生事实真伪不明的情形下,作为举证责任分配主体的法官,其分配举证责任的思维方式往往决定着不利诉讼后果的承担者。本文试图通过对当事人事实主张的深入剖析和对法官分配举证责任的思维方式的探索,以求对此类案件的举证责任分配问题有所裨益。
In the practice of civil trial, the negative opinions on defendants have a direct impact on the judgment results of the case, especially in cases where the truth of the facts is unknown, as the judge who distributes the burden of proof as the subject of the burden of proof Ways often determine the consequences of unfavorable litigation. This article attempts to analyze the facts of the parties in-depth and to explore the way of thinking of judges to allocate the burden of proof to explore the distribution of such cases the burden of proof benefits.