论文部分内容阅读
《中华人民共和国物权法》施行已有5年时间,其中的问题也日益凸显出来。在对权利质权的规定中,相比《担保法》而言确定了应收账款可以出质,无疑这顺应了时代的发展。但是,对于应收账款的范围没有明确界定,权利冲突、顺位规则也没有相关规定。2007年中国人民银行颁布的《应收账款质押登记办法》与地方性法规的冲突也不可调和。这些都亟待最高人民法院出台相关司法解释。本文对应收账款的范围,一般债权质权的设立等问题进行分析,提出自己的观点,以期对进一步完善一般债权质权制度有所帮助。
The “Real Right Law of the People’s Republic of China” has been in operation for five years, and the problems among them have become increasingly prominent. In the provisions on pledge of rights, it is undoubtedly in conformity with the development of the times that the receivables can be pledged as compared with the “Guarantee Law”. However, the scope of accounts receivable is not clearly defined, the conflict of rights, the order rules there is no relevant provisions. 2007 People’s Bank of China promulgated the “receivables pledge registration” and the conflict of local laws and regulations can not be reconciled. All of these urgently require the Supreme People’s Court to issue relevant judicial interpretations. This article analyzes the scope of receivables, the establishment of general claims and other issues, put forward my own point of view, with a view to further improve the general right to pledge system.