本文对权威性辞书我国的《政治经济学辞典》、《辞海(经济分册)》和西方的《新帕尔格雷夫经济学大辞典》对“剥削”一词作的概念性释义作了比较分析,认为我国传统的释义有较大的局限性,而“帕氏”的释义却有一定的可取性。根据历史和现实的实践与理论需要作者提出了对剥削概念含义的新见解。 This article makes a conceptual interpretation of the term “exploitation” in the authoritative dictionaries of China’s Dictionary of Political Economy, Cihai (Economic Edition) and the Western New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics A comparative analysis shows that the traditional interpretation of our country has greater limitations, and the interpretation of “Pa’s ” has a certain degree of desirability. According to historical and practical needs of practice and theory, the authors propose new ideas about the implications of the concept of exploitation.