论文部分内容阅读
分析了110种国内医学院校学报的现况,发现92.7%为学术类,7.3%为综合类;季刊和双月刊分别占50.0%和43.6%;中位发行量为1000(100～5000)册;都有编委会,中位编委人数为40(10～105);有1种学报没有同行审稿制度,中位审稿人数为60(2～360);经费来自上级拨款和收取发表费的分别占91.8%和59.1%;亏本的占69.3%;年赢余1～10万的占25.0%,收支持平的占5.7%。对改进国内医学院校学报的现况提出了一些建议。
Analyzed the current situation of 110 domestic medical college journals and found that 92.7% were academic and 7.3% were general; quarterly and bi-monthly accounted for 50.0% and 43.6% respectively; median circulation was 1000 (100-5000) There are editorial boards, the median number of editorial board 40 (10 ~ 105); there is a peer review peer review system, the number of reviewers 60 (2 ~ 360); funding from the higher funding and publishing fees Accounting for 91.8% and 59.1% respectively; accounting for 69.3% of the total loss; accounting for 25.0% of the annual surplus of 1% to 100,000 and 5.7% of the average income and expense. Some suggestions are put forward to improve the status quo of domestic medical college journals.