背景:在输血前的检验中,对抗-D、-C和-G的特异性的差异,临床上很少认为重要,但在同种免疫妊娠,识别这些抗体的特异性也许是很有必要的。临床预后和Rh免疫球蛋白的预防治疗,都依靠这些抗体的准确的确认。病例报告:一妊娠妇女,初产、第4次妊娠,在妊娠早期每隔一个适当的间隔期输注一次Rh免疫球蛋白,检查发现有抗-D(效价=4)和抗-C(效价=32),特定的吸附和洗脱实验显示, BACKGROUND: In tests prior to transfusion, differences in specificity against -D, -C and -G are rarely clinically important, but recognizing the specificity of these antibodies may be necessary in alloimmune pregnancies . Clinical prognosis and prevention and treatment of Rh immunoglobulin rely on the accurate confirmation of these antibodies. Case Reports: A pregnant woman, primiparous, the fourth pregnancy, with Rh immunoglobulin infused at an appropriate interval during the first trimester of pregnancy, was found to have anti-D (titer = 4) and anti-C Titer = 32), specific adsorption and elution experiments show that,