论文部分内容阅读
“范畴”一词在后经典叙事学的讨论中频繁出现,但对于其涵义,研究者们并没有形成一致的观点,在使用中也存在语义混淆或混乱的情形。本文在追溯“范畴”一词的西学本源和中文语义的前提下,以新的角度界定了范畴近“类”、“概念”、“域”等三个层面的涵义,梳理了后经典叙事学中范畴的语义种种,最终提出后经典叙事学范畴体系的构建应围绕元范畴、次属元范畴、核心范畴和基本范畴等构成的动态的、立体的层级系统展开。
The term “category” frequently appears in the discussion of post-classical narratology. However, researchers do not come to a consensus on its conception, and confusion or confusion exists in its use. Based on the origin of the Western source of “category” and the semantic meaning of Chinese, this paper delimits the categories “category”, “concept” and “domain” in a new perspective Meaning, combing the semantics of the category in the post-classical narratology, and ultimately proposes that the construction of the category system of the post-classical narratology should be based on the dynamic, three-dimensional hierarchy of meta-categories, subordinate categories, core categories and basic categories .