论文部分内容阅读
0引言死刑的存废之争不仅是学术界争论的焦点,也是民众广泛关注的话题,本文运用法律多元理论视角探讨了暂缓废除死刑的原因。在法律多元理论基础上,从法律与社会、人权取向和现实制度等三方面进行了具体分析,解释了废除死刑不能急于求成的原因。1问题提出2011年5月1日施行的《中华人民共和国刑法修正案(八)》,中国的死刑罪名减至55个。保留死刑、严格适用是中国长期以来的刑事政策;但修改法律明确减少
0 Introduction The debate about the death penalty of the death penalty is not only the focus of academic debate but also a topic of widespread public concern. This paper uses the perspective of legal pluralism to probe into the reasons for the suspension of the death penalty. Based on the theory of pluralism of law, this article analyzes concretely from three aspects: law and society, human rights orientation and reality system, and explains why we should not abolish the death penalty. 1 Issues Put forward the “Amendment to the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China (8)”, which took effect on May 1, 2011, reducing the death penalty to 55 in China. Keeping the death penalty strictly applicable is a long-standing criminal policy in China; however, it is clear that the amendment law will be reduced