论文部分内容阅读
伯希和于1909年访问北京期间,向京师一批学者展示其随身携带的部分敦煌文献,北京学界随后公宴伯希和,达成今后影印、刊布法藏敦煌文献的口头协议。日本人田中庆太郎在1909年11月发表的《敦煌石室中的典籍》一文中,记录这次公宴时间为1909年9月4日。数十年来中外论著多采用此日期,但该日期明显有悖于其他相关史实。恽毓鼎在1909年10月4日日记中记录了公宴之事,为确定公宴日期提供了另一个选择,但仍属于孤证。2012年12月刊布的宣统元年八月廿二日(1909年10月5日)恽毓鼎致沈曾植信,再次将公宴时间锁定在1909年10月4日,并提供了更多的相关信息,从而最终解决了公宴时间问题。本文对这封恽毓鼎致沈曾植信进行了全方位的分析和研究,讨论了北京学界公宴伯希和的前因后果,论证了公宴伯希和日期为1909年10月4日的正确性,揭示了这封恽毓鼎致沈曾植信在伯希和1909年北京之行研究中所具有的史料价值。
During his visit to Beijing in 1909, Behçethe presented some of his Dunhuang documents to Beijing academics. Later, BeiJing academics then formally invited him to establish an oral agreement to photocopy and publish Dunhuang documents in France in the future. Japanese Tanaka Keita Taro published in November 1909, “Dunhuang Shishi in the classics,” a article, record the banquet time for the September 4, 1909. This date has been mostly adopted by Chinese and foreign literary works for decades, but this date is obviously contrary to other relevant historical facts. Yu-Ding recorded the banquet in his diary on October 4, 1909, providing another alternative for determining the date of banquet, but he still belongs to the solitary card. Published in December 2012, Xuantong, August 22, 1905 (October 5, 1909) Yu Yuting led Shen Zenamitsu once again locked the banquet time on October 4, 1909 and provided more relevant information. Which eventually solved the problem of the time of the public banquet. This article conducted a comprehensive analysis and research on this etiquette, Shen Zengzhi, and discussed the antecedents and consequences of Bei Xi, a feudal official in Beijing, and demonstrated the correctness of Beauish and his date of October 4, 1909, revealing The historical value of this essay written by Shen Zengzhi and Shen Zeng Zhixin in his study of Behzi and his 1909 Beijing tour.