论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨封闭式负压引流技术治疗开放性胸部伤口的临床疗效。方法:选取我院2013-03-2017-01收集的胸部开放性外伤的患者84例,随机分为试验组和对照组,2组均为42例,其中试验组采用复合封闭式负压引流技术治疗,对照组采用常规治疗和普通换药,观察2组患者的治疗有效率、住院时间和患者伤口愈合时间。结果:2组患者治疗效果比较发现,试验组患者治疗有效率为97.6%,对照组为89.3%,试验组患者治疗有效率明显高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组患者住院时间、伤口愈合时间的比较发现:试验组患者住院时间为(8.4±2.1)d,对照组为(14.2±1.9)d,试验组患者住院时间明显短于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。试验组患者伤口愈合时间为(6.9±2.5)d,对照组为(12.2±3.1)d,试验组伤口愈合时间明显短于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:复合封闭式负压引流技术能够提高开放性胸部伤口的治疗有效率,缩短伤口愈合时间和住院时间,具有更好的临床疗效。
Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy of closed negative pressure drainage in the treatment of open thoracic wounds. Methods: Totally 84 patients with chest open trauma collected in our hospital from March 2013 to March 2017 were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, with 42 cases in both groups. The patients in the experimental group were treated with closed closed negative pressure drainage The patients in the control group were treated with routine and common dressing. The treatment efficiency, hospitalization time and wound healing time were observed in two groups. Results: The therapeutic effect of two groups of patients was found that the effective rate was 97.6% in the experimental group and 89.3% in the control group. The treatment efficiency in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P <0.05). The hospitalization time and wound healing time of two groups were compared: the hospitalization time was (8.4 ± 2.1) days in the experimental group and (14.2 ± 1.9) days in the control group, and the hospitalization time in the experimental group was significantly shorter than that in the control group Significance (P <0.05). The wound healing time was (6.9 ± 2.5) days in the test group and (12.2 ± 3.1) days in the control group. The wound healing time in the experimental group was significantly shorter than that in the control group (P <0.05). Conclusion: Combined closed negative pressure drainage technology can improve the therapeutic efficiency of open chest wound, shorten the time of wound healing and hospitalization, and have better clinical efficacy.