论文部分内容阅读
小麦、水稻化除在我州已推广多年,但曲于这项工作在技术和时间上要求严格,尤其在生产责任制改变以后,一部分农户嫌费工、费时、成本高,不愿再搞。鉴于以上情况,我们在自治区植保站的安排和支持下,做了“小麦、水稻化除经济效益对比试验”。 试验:在清水河农场农业四队及博湖县塔温觉肯村两点进行。试验分药剂处理区、人工拔除区、对照区,小麦化除选用70％2.4—D丁酯,水稻采用50％杀草丹及40％除草醚。小麦采用泰山—18型弥雾喷粉机常规喷雾,水稻采用常规喷雾及播前毒土封闭两种方式。喷药后每五天调查一次。
In addition to the promotion of wheat and paddy rice in the state for many years, the song is technically and time-intensive in this work. In particular, after the change of the production responsibility system, some farmers think that they are labor-intensive, time-consuming and costly, and are reluctant to engage in any further work. In view of the above, under the arrangement and support of the Plant Protection Station of Autonomous Region, we conducted a “comparative experiment on the economic benefits of wheat and rice.” Test: Qingshuihe farm four teams of agriculture and Lake County Lake Wenjue Ken village two points. Test points of the drug treatment area, artificial extraction area, the control area, the selection of wheat except 70% 2.4-D butyl ester, rice with 50% herbicide Dan and 40% weed ether. Wheat using Taishan -18 Mist Duster conventional spray, rice conventional spraying and sowing poisonous soil closed two ways. Investigate every five days after spraying.