论文部分内容阅读
用文本摇动学生的心灵,多么美妙的境界,多么迷人的作文教学境地,如此操控作文教学,本身就是对执教者才情、学养、审美鉴赏力的综合考验,还是对执教者写作素养的专项考查,选文的精到是一方面,对选文写作借鉴点的捕捉,则更见功力。读万卷书,行万里路,但未必可以写万字长文,这是阅读与写作的悖论。这个悖论的本质是读书缺乏情性的摇荡,行路失却思想的伴随,没有性情的阅读,没有思想的行走,书是书,路是路,自然不会有激情的冲动,不会有思绪的张狂,自然与写作无缘。人文至上,以人为本,新课标将语文的教与学,进行了一番涅槃式的革命,于是作文技法的训练黯然从台前躲到了幕后,作文教学少了一个显性的操作模式,甚至到了谈技法而色变的境地。是写作引领阅读,还是以阅读带动写作,成了一个公婆各有话说的僵持的问题。作为编辑,也作为一个一线的老师,我实在不能在二者中间来个是与非的判别。换个角度,如果以训练的流派与手段来观照,这也许会更显宽容,给各方以足够的生存的理由,留等实践去证明。
The use of text to shake the student’s mind, how wonderful the realm, and how charming the composition teaching environment, so manipulation of composition teaching, itself is a comprehensive test of the talent of the coach, scholarship, aesthetic appreciation, or a special examination of the writing literacy of the coach. On the one hand, the essence of the selection of the text is more effective in capturing the reference points of the text. Reading thousands of books will take thousands of miles, but you may not be able to write 10,000 characters. This is the paradox of reading and writing. The essence of this paradox is the lack of understanding of books, the accompanied thoughts, the lack of sexual reading, the lack of ideological walking, the book as a book, and the road as a road. Naturally there will be no passion and no thoughts. Madness, nature and writing missed. Humanism is the supreme, people-oriented, and the new curriculum standard will carry out a Nirvana-style revolution in the teaching and learning of Chinese language. Therefore, the training of essay techniques seems to hide behind the scenes from behind the stage, and there is no obvious mode of operation for composition teaching, even to the point of Talk about techniques and change the situation. Whether it is writing to lead reading or writing to lead writing has become a stalemate in which everybody has a saying. As an editor, as a front-line teacher, I really cannot distinguish between right and wrong in the middle of the two. From another perspective, if we take a look at the schools and methods of training, this may be more tolerant, give the parties sufficient reason to survive, and leave it to practice to prove.