论文部分内容阅读
我国的指导性案例制度长期处于非规范化阶段,直到2010年才步入制度化、规范化运作阶段。2015年《<最高人民法院关于案例指导工作的规定>的实施细则》(下称:《实施细则》)完善了我国的指导性案例制度,但是该实施细则并未臻于完美。由于我国指导性案例制度的相关内容过于模糊、指导性案例的效力定位不明,以及受我国的成文法传统的影响,指导性案例制度在司法实践中未能充分发挥其应有的价值。本文认为应当明确指导性案例的效力定位,建立健全指导性案例救济机制和备案机制,以充分发挥案例指导制度对于统一司法裁判标准的功能,保障社会公平、正义。
China’s guiding case system has long been in a non-standardization stage, and it was not until 2010 that it entered a stage of institutionalization and standardization. The Implementation Rules of the Supreme People’s Court on the Guidance for Case Work in 2015 (the “Regulations”) have perfected China’s guiding case system, but the implementation rules are not perfect. Due to the ambiguous content of the guiding case system in our country, the unclear validity of the guiding case and the influence of the statute law in our country, the guiding case system fails to give full play to its due value in judicial practice. This paper argues that the effectiveness orientation of guiding cases should be clarified, the relief mechanism and the filing mechanism of guiding cases should be established and improved so as to give full play to the function of the case guiding system in unifying standards of judicial adjudication and guaranteeing social fairness and justice.