论文部分内容阅读
朱子哲学具有“致广大、尽精微,综罗百代”的特点。历代以来,关于朱子哲学的一些重要问题,学者们有时会有不同的理解。对于朱子的心性论(道德心理学),就更是如此了。去岁,许家星先生撰文1批评笔者在《〈朱子语类〉中两条重要语录辩误》(发表于《中国哲学史》2004年第1期)一文(以下简称“拙文”)中所持的观点。对于许博士花费时间与精力对我的论文提出商榷,这种精神令人欣赏。但是,在反复阅读该文(以下简称“许文”)之后,我认为,许文的论证是站不住脚的。
Zhu philosophy has “” to the general, to make subtle, Luo hundred hundred “features. Since ancient times, scholars sometimes have different understandings on some important issues of Zhu’s philosophy. This is even more true of Zhu’s psychology (moral psychology). Last year, Mr. Xu Jiaxing’s article 1 criticized the author in his article ”The Debate of Two Important Quotations in the Zhu Zi Language“ (published in ”History of Chinese Philosophy“, 2004, No. 1) (hereinafter referred to as ”Zhuo Wen“) the opinion of. This spirit is admirable for Dr. Xu who spent time and effort discussing my thesis. However, after reading the article repeatedly (hereinafter referred to as ”Xu Wen"), I think the argument of Xu Wen is untenable.