论文部分内容阅读
本文基于二元经济、实物现金为标的的收入水平局限性、人情社会等转型阶段的历史特征,从社会资本的角度对广义收入差距问题进行经济学和社会学的对比论证。基于回归分解,在控制其他收入来源不变的情况下,对广义收入差距贡献最大的是行业,在排除随机扰动项的贡献之外,它分别贡献了总体不平等和预测值不平等的27%和51.2%;位于第二梯队的是年龄和区域变量,它们分别贡献了总体不平等和预测值不平等的9.2%、17.1%和4.3%、7.96%;第三梯队的影响变量分别是社会资本、教育、政治身份、性别、家庭规模和经验;而职业类型的影响还不足总体的0.2%。
Based on the historical characteristics of the transitional stages such as dual economy and real cash, the historical characteristics of transitional stages such as the human society and social transition, this paper makes a comparative study of economics and sociology from the perspective of social capital. Based on regression decomposition, the industry that contributes most to the generalized income gap while controlling other sources of income remains the industry, contributing 27% of the overall inequality and predicted inequality separately from the contribution of the stochastic disturbance, And 51.2% respectively. The second and third echelon variables are age and regional variables, which contribute 9.2%, 17.1% and 4.3% and 7.96% of the overall inequality and the predicted inequality respectively. The third echelon’s influence variables are social capital , Education, political status, gender, family size and experience, while the impact of occupational types is less than 0.2% of the population as a whole.