自从本刊于去年第五期发表《全日制六年制不分科的重点中学物理教学大纲》(征求意见稿)以来,承广大读者的支持,寄来了大量稿件。由于篇幅有限,我们只能登载少量的有代表性的文章。总的看来,这次讨论是热烈的,广泛的。有关同志各抒己见,既基本肯定了这次修订大纲的指导思想,也同时在一些具体教材的选择和安排上提出了不同的意见和改进建议。大家的意见不尽相同,有的甚至正好相反,这是很自然的,但所有的意见都可供大纲修改定稿时参考。我们认为,这次讨论是非常有益的,不但能对大纲的修改定稿有所帮助,而且通过交换意见,可以活跃教学思想,有助于提高教学质量。 Since the magazine published the “Full-time Six-year Non-Disciplinary High School Physics Syllabus” (Exposure Draft) published in the fifth issue last year, a large number of articles have been sent out with the support of readers. Due to the limited space, we can only publish a small number of representative articles. In general, this discussion is warm and extensive. The relevant comrades express their views on each other, both basically affirmed the guidelines for the revision of the outline, but also put forward different opinions and suggestions for improvement on the selection and arrangement of some specific textbooks. Everyone’s opinions vary, and some are even opposite. This is very natural, but all the comments are for reference when finalizing the outline. In our opinion, this discussion is very helpful. It not only helps in finalizing the outline amendments, but also exchanging opinions so as to activate teaching ideas and help improve teaching quality.